D'Arrigo v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
This text of 115 A.D.2d 345 (D'Arrigo v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and defendant’s motion granted. Memorandum: Special Term should have been granted summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint seeking recovery under a homeowner’s policy for loss of a motorcycle. The policy specifically excluded from coverage, "motorized land vehicles except those used to service an insured’s residence which are not licensed for road use”. The motorcycle clearly falls within this exclusion since it is a motorized land vehicle and it was not used to service the insured’s residence. The fact that the motorcycle, if in dead storage, may not fall within the definition of "motor [346]*346vehicle” as defined in the policy is immaterial; it is nevertheless a motorized land vehicle and hence excluded from coverage for its loss. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Donovan, J.—summary judgment.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Boomer, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A.D.2d 345, 495 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darrigo-v-aetna-casualty-surety-co-nyappdiv-1985.