Darren Klemencic and Niurka Klemencic v. U.S. Bank National Association
This text of 142 So. 3d 983 (Darren Klemencic and Niurka Klemencic v. U.S. Bank National Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*984 CONCESSION OF ERROR
Defendants appeal a final judgment of mortgage foreclosure in favor of U.S. Bank (“appellee”). Appellee concedes that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to meet its burden of proving standing to enforce the note it introduced. See McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 79 So.3d 170, 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (finding that a “plaintiff must prove that it had standing to foreclose when the complaint was filed.” (citation omitted)). Because appellee failed to prove it had standing to foreclose, we reverse the final judgment and remand for the trial court to enter an involuntary dismissal of the complaint.
Reversed and Remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 So. 3d 983, 2014 WL 3730043, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darren-klemencic-and-niurka-klemencic-v-us-bank-national-association-fladistctapp-2014.