Darren Haarstad v. Shantera McGhee

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 19, 2023
DocketA24A0238
StatusPublished

This text of Darren Haarstad v. Shantera McGhee (Darren Haarstad v. Shantera McGhee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darren Haarstad v. Shantera McGhee, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ September 19, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A0238. DARREN HAARSTAD v. SHANTERA MCGHEE.

At the request of Shantera McGhee, the trial court entered a stalking twelve month protective order against Darren Haarstad. Haarstad then filed this direct

appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. As a general rule, stalking protective orders may be appealed directly. See,

generally, Thornton v. Hemphill, 300 Ga. App. 647 (686 SE2d 263) (2009); Rawcliffe v. Rawcliffe, 283 Ga. App. 264 (641 SE2d 255) (2007). However, a discretionary

application is required to appeal a protective order if such order was entered under the Family Violence Act because such cases are domestic relations cases within the

meaning of OCGA § 5-6- 35 (a) (2). See Schmidt v. Schmidt, 270 Ga. 461, 461-462 (1) (510 SE2d 810) (1999), disapproved on other grounds by Gilliam v. State, 312 Ga.

60 (860 SE2d 543) (2021); see also OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2) (appeals from orders in domestic relations cases must be by discretionary application). “Family violence” is defined under the Act as the occurrence of specified acts “between past or present spouses, persons who are parents of the same child, parents and children, stepparents

and stepchildren, foster parents and foster children, and other persons living or formerly living in the same household.” OCGA § 19-13-1. Here, Haarstad and McGhee are the parents of a minor son. Consequently, Harrstad was required to following the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review of the protective order. Harrstad’s failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which

is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 09/19/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thornton v. Hemphill
686 S.E.2d 263 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Rawcliffe v. Rawcliffe
641 S.E.2d 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Schmidt v. Schmidt
510 S.E.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Gilliam v. State
860 S.E.2d 543 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Darren Haarstad v. Shantera McGhee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darren-haarstad-v-shantera-mcghee-gactapp-2023.