Darrell Williams v. Anthony Padula

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Darrell Williams v. Anthony Padula. Read the opinion of the Court — 439 F. App'x 269
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2012·No. 11-7547·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7547

DARRELL J. WILLIAMS, f/k/a Alvin Glenn,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ANTHONY J. PADULA; GERALDINE MIRO, Deputy Directed Programs,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (2:10-cv-02707-CMC)

Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 24, 2012

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darrell J. Williams appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Williams v. Padula, No. 2:10-cv-02707-CMC (D.S.C. Oct. 21,

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darrell Williams v. Anthony Padula, (4th Cir. 2012).

Darrell Williams v. Anthony Padula (Darrell Williams v. Anthony Padula) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related