Darrell Sanders v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 16, 2026·No. 3D2022-1470·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 16, 2026.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D22-1470

Lower Tribunal No. F17-626

Darrell Sanders,

Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.

Rasco Klock, and Joseph P. Klock, Jr., for appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, C.J., and LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See D.G. v. State, 315 So. 3d 72, 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)

(“The trial court’s finding of a willful and substantial violation of probation term is reviewed for competent, substantial evidence. The trial court’s decision to revoke probation based on such evidence is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”) (citation omitted); Savage v. State, 120 So. 3d 619, 621 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (“[W]e first assess whether the finding of a willful and substantial [probation] violation is supported by competent substantial evidence.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darrell Sanders v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Darrell Sanders v. State of Florida (Darrell Sanders v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Savage v. State
120 So. 3d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)