Darrell Lee Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 29, 2014·No. 04-14-00624-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00624-CR

Darrell Lee JACKSON, Appellant

v. The State The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CR2210 Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 29, 2014

DISMISSED

On September 10, 2014, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed

pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the

right of appeal was made part of the appellate record within thirty days. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175-76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003,

order). Appellant did not file an amended certification. The clerk’s record does not contain a

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court

certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has 04-14-00624-CR

NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment

assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the

defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no

right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(d).

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darrell Lee Jackson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Darrell Lee Jackson v. State (Darrell Lee Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)