Darrell Julian and Ted Hennis v. Cadence McShane Constructon Company, LLC and Pinpoint Commercial LP, General Partner of PPC GP, LLC

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 10, 2015
• Docket: 01-15-00465-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-15-00465-CV Style: Darrell Julian and Ted Hennis v. Cadence McShane Construction Company, LLC and Pinpoint Commercial LP, General Partner of PPC GP, LLC Date motion filed*: May 26, 2015 Type of motion: Motion to Extend the Time to File the Notice of Appeal Party filing motion: Appellants Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? Yes

If motion to extend time: Original due date: May 11, 2015 (Notice of appeal deadline) Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: N/A Date Requested: May 26, 2015

Ordered that motion is:  Granted  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellants’ motion to extend the time to file their notice of appeal, because they miscalendared the deadline to appeal the interlocutory order denying their special appearance, is granted because it was filed within the 15-day grace period of the notice of appeal deadline and is a reasonable explanation. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014(a)(7) (West Supp. 2014); TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b), 26.3; Hone v. Hanafin, 104 S.W.3d 884, 886 (Tex. 2003).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley 

Date: June 9, 2015

November 7, 2008 Revision