Darrell J. Mickell v. Bryan Stirling

698 F. App'x 749
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 12, 2017·No. 17-6282·Unpublished·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darrell J. Mickell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment in Miekell’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action and the magistrate judge’s orders denying his motions to appoint counsel and to compel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mickell v. Stirling, No. 6:15-cv-04656-RBH (D.S.C. Dec. 29, 2015; Jan. 25, 2016; Sept. 13, 2016; Feb. 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately, presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darrell J. Mickell v. Bryan Stirling, 698 F. App'x 749 (4th Cir. 2017).

698 F. App'x 749 (Darrell J. Mickell v. Bryan Stirling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related