Darocha v. First Citizens Bank

Fourth Circuit

Darocha v. First Citizens Bank

407 F. App'x 695

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 18, 2011·No. No. 10-2117·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael D. Darocha appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his civil complaint against First Citizens Bank. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Darocha v. First Citizens Bank, No. 7:10-cv-00367-gec, 2010 WL 3292662 (W.D.Va. filed Aug. 18, 2010, entered Aug. Aug. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael D. Darocha appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his civil complaint against First Citizens Bank. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Darocha v. First Citizens Bank, No. 7:10-cv-00367-gec, 2010 WL 3292662 (W.D.Va. filed Aug. 18, 2010, entered Aug. Aug. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Darocha v. First Citizens Bank, 407 F. App'x 695 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

407 F. App'x 695 (Darocha v. First Citizens Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.