Darnell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Darnell v. State

192 S.W.2d 1163, 192 S.W. 1163, 80 Tex. Crim. 643, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 33

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 28, 1917·No. No. 4369.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of misdemeanor theft, his punishment being assessed at a fine of $1 and two days imprisonment in the county jail.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The complaint and information seem to be sufficient. As the record is presented we are of opinion that the judgment ought to be affirmed, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of misdemeanor theft, his punishment being assessed at a fine of $1 and two days imprisonment in the county jail.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The complaint and information seem to be sufficient. As the record is presented we are of opinion that the judgment ought to be affirmed, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Affirmed.

Darnell v. State, 192 S.W.2d 1163, 192 S.W. 1163, 80 Tex. Crim. 643, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 33 (Tex. 1917).

Pincite

192 S.W.2d 1163 (Darnell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.