Darnell v. State

147 S.W. 599, 66 Tex. Crim. 519, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 320
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 22, 1912
DocketNo. 1787.
StatusPublished

This text of 147 S.W. 599 (Darnell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darnell v. State, 147 S.W. 599, 66 Tex. Crim. 519, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 320 (Tex. 1912).

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

This appeal is from the final judgment on a forfeited bail bond. The term of the court at which the judgment was rendered convened on August 28 and adjourned October 14, 1911. The judgment was rendered September 18, 1911. The appeal bond was filed Hovember 3, 1911. The record was not filed in this court until February 17, 1912. The Assistant Attorney-General insists that the appeal shall be dismissed because the record was filed here too late.

Appeals to this court in such cases are regulated and governed by appeals in civil cases. The State’s contention is, therefore, correct *520 and this canse must be dismissed. Hollenbeck v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 584; Carleton v. State, 68 S. W., 511.

Appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hollenbeck v. State
51 S.W. 373 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1899)
Turner v. State
68 S.W. 511 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 S.W. 599, 66 Tex. Crim. 519, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darnell-v-state-texcrimapp-1912.