Darnell v. Long Island Railroad

222 A.D. 751

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Vinie A. Darnell was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. (Fitch v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 233 N. Y. 356; La Goy v. Director-General of Railroads, 231 id. 191; Cassidy v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville R. R. Co., 234 id. 599; Hagglund v. Erie R. R. Co., 210 id. 46; Van Wormer v. Schenectady Railway Co., 207 App. Div. 7.) The facts in Chamberlain v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. (238 N. Y. 233) distinguish it from the foregoing cases and the instant case. In view of this disposition of the case, the appeal from the order denying motion for a new trial is dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darnell v. Long Island Railroad, 222 A.D. 751 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

222 A.D. 751 (Darnell v. Long Island Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chamberlain v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.
144 N.E. 512 (New York Court of Appeals, 1924)
Fitch v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.
135 N.E. 598 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
Van Wormer v. Schenectady Railway Co.
207 A.D. 7 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)