Darnell Trice v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Darnell Trice v. United States

218 F.2d 588

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 18, 1955·No. 406_1·Published

Opinion

218 F.2d 588

Darnell TRICE, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

Misc. No. 406.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 18, 1955.

Darnell Trice, in pro per.

No appearance for respondent.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Movant alleges that he was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii for possession of narcotics. He further states that he moved the sentencing court to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which motion was denied on February 19, 1954, and no appeal was taken. This does not entitle him to seek habeas corpus.

The motion is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

218 F.2d 588

Darnell TRICE, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

Misc. No. 406.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 18, 1955.

Darnell Trice, in pro per.

No appearance for respondent.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Movant alleges that he was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii for possession of narcotics. He further states that he moved the sentencing court to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which motion was denied on February 19, 1954, and no appeal was taken. This does not entitle him to seek habeas corpus.

The motion is dismissed.

Darnell Trice v. United States, 218 F.2d 588 (9th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

218 F.2d 588 (Darnell Trice v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related