Darnell Ramajita Adkins v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Appellate case name: Darnell Ramajita Adkins v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-13-00627-CR
Trial court case number: 1362336
Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County
The “Agreed Motion to Substitute Counsel” filed by appellant’s counsel does not comply with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5 because it does not indicate that the motion was delivered to appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b) (stating, “The motion must be delivered to the party―both by certified and by first-class mail―to the party at the party’s last known address”); TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(d) (providing that motion for substitution of counsel must comply with TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b)). Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to STRIKE the motion. We ORDER counsel to file a motion for substitution of counsel that complies with Rule 6.5 no later 7 days from the date of this order. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle Acting individually
Date: August 5, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Darnell Ramajita Adkins v. State (Darnell Ramajita Adkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.