Darnell McGary v. Kelly Cunningham

559 F. App'x 617
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 2014
Docket13-35882
StatusUnpublished

This text of 559 F. App'x 617 (Darnell McGary v. Kelly Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darnell McGary v. Kelly Cunningham, 559 F. App'x 617 (9th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Darnell Otis McGary appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendant prison officials. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24, 129 S.Ct. 365, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review). 1

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Appellees’ request to stay this appeal pending the outcome of McGary's criminal charges is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
559 F. App'x 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darnell-mcgary-v-kelly-cunningham-ca9-2014.