Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Darnell M. Tillman v. State

Darnell M. Tillman v. State

207 So. 3d 255, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11168
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 22, 2016
Docket5D16-112
StatusPublished

This text of 207 So. 3d 255 (Darnell M. Tillman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darnell M. Tillman v. State, 207 So. 3d 255, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11168 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darnell Tillman appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. The motion alleged claims related to Tillman’s 2000 trial and sentencing as well as his 2012 resentencing. We affirm the trial court’s order except as to the claim that trial counsel failed to present mitigation evidence at Tillman’s resentencing. Although facially insufficient, Tillman should have been given an opportunity to amend that claim. See Caballero v. State, 132 So.3d 369 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caballero v. State
132 So. 3d 369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 So. 3d 255, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darnell-m-tillman-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.