Darnell Jones v. Thomas Lawson Harold A. Black Warden of the Augusta Correctional Center

73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4158, 1996 WL 4314
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 5, 1996
Docket95-7527
StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 357 (Darnell Jones v. Thomas Lawson Harold A. Black Warden of the Augusta Correctional Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darnell Jones v. Thomas Lawson Harold A. Black Warden of the Augusta Correctional Center, 73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4158, 1996 WL 4314 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Darnell JONES, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Thomas LAWSON; Harold A. Black; Warden of the Augusta
Correctional Center, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 95-7527.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 5, 1996.

Darnell Jones, Appellant Pro Se. SY W.D.Va.

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appealg and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Lawson, No. CA-95-1025-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 19, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

We gather from Appellant's notice of appeal and informal brief to this court that he believes that those documents have begun the exhaustion process. In order to satisfy the exhaustion requirement of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(b), (c), Appellant must initiate a separate proceeding in state court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4158, 1996 WL 4314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darnell-jones-v-thomas-lawson-harold-a-black-warde-ca4-1996.