Darnell Hartsfield v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 4, 2010
Docket06-09-00007-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Darnell Hartsfield v. State (Darnell Hartsfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darnell Hartsfield v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                                                ______________________________

                                                             No. 06-09-00007-CR

                                   DARNELL HARTSFIELD, Appellant

                                                                V.

                                     THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                                      On Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court

                                                              Rusk County, Texas

                                                         Trial Court No. CR05-334

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                        Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss


                                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

            A jury convicted Darnell Hartsfield of five counts of capital murder; he was sentenced to  punishment at life imprisonment. Hartsfield appeals from his conviction and has filed a single brief, in which he raises issues common to all of his appeals.[1]  He argues that the trial court committed reversible error in that (1) the evidence supporting his conviction was legally and factually insufficient and (2) admitting evidence of an extraneous offense.

            We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date in Hartsfield’s appeal in cause number 06-09-00006-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that error has not been shown in this case.

            We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                        Chief Justice

Date Submitted:          October 21, 2009

Date Decided:             February 4, 2010

Do Not Publish          



[1]Defendant appeals from five convictions, for capital murder, cause numbers 06-09-00006-CR through 06-09-00010-CR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Darnell Hartsfield v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darnell-hartsfield-v-state-texapp-2010.