Darnal v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Darnal v. United States

136 F. 1022, 68 C.C.A. 678, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4530

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMay 3, 1905

DocketNo. 1,380

StatusPublished

This text of 136 F. 1022 (Darnal v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Darnal v. United States, 136 F. 1022, 68 C.C.A. 678, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4530 (6th Cir. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in this case was convicted of the offense of mailing an obscene letter in violation of the provisions of section 3893 of the Revised Statutes [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2658]. The only question for our determination of any importance is whether the letter was of the character of matter made nonmailable by the statute, and of this we have no doubt. The letter is not fit for publication, and we must, therefore, forbear a discussion of its contents. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in this case was convicted of the offense of mailing an obscene letter in violation of the provisions of section 3893 of the Revised Statutes [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2658]. The only question for our determination of any importance is whether the letter was of the character of matter made nonmailable by the statute, and of this we have no doubt. The letter is not fit for publication, and we must, therefore, forbear a discussion of its contents. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 F. 1022, 68 C.C.A. 678, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darnal-v-united-states-ca6-1905.