Darn v. Wiseman
This text of 94 S.E.2d 65 (Darn v. Wiseman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff proved his case as laid except as to the penalty sued for, the right to the recovery of which was abandoned, and the court erred in granting a nonsuit. Gray v. Schlapp, 92 Ga. App. 261(1) (88 S. E. 2d 536).
The plaintiff did not disprove his right to recover by showing that he rendered fifty-eight individual statements at a set figure per mile for services from February, 1952, through June, 1953, without rendering a statement for the taxes sued for. The plaintiff testified that sometime during the latter part of 1954 an agent from the Internal Revenue Service of the United States was checking his records and inquired about the payment of the Federal excise tax on the transportation of property and that this was the first he knew that any tax was due on such transportation. The court erred in granting a nonsuit.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 S.E.2d 65, 94 Ga. App. 216, 52 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 999, 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darn-v-wiseman-gactapp-1956.