Darlington v. Speakman
9 Watts & Serg. 182
This text of 9 Watts & Serg. 182 (Darlington v. Speakman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Darlington v. Speakman, 9 Watts & Serg. 182 (Pa. 1844).
Opinion
This Court ordered the record to be remitted to the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware county, with directions to permit the [183]*183plaintiffs to suggest the death of William Speakman, Sen., and substitute the names of Clement Darlington and Azariah Thomas, his executors, as parties to the judgment, nunc pro tunc; and to reinstate the execution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dunham v. Bentley
72 N.W. 437 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
Banta v. Board of Trustees
39 N.J. Eq. 123 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1884)
Webb v. Mallard
27 Tex. 80 (Texas Supreme Court, 1863)
Graham v. Chandler
15 Ala. 342 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1849)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 Watts & Serg. 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darlington-v-speakman-pa-1844.