Darlington v. Mager

256 U.S. 682, 41 S. Ct. 533, 65 L. Ed. 1169, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1299, 4 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 4745
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 18, 1921·No. No. 716·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs, upon authority of the Act of February 24, 1919, c. 18, § 213a, 40 Stat., 1057,; 1065; Act of September 8, 1916, c. 463, § 2 (a), 39 Stat. 756, 757; Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U. S. 509; Eldorado Coal & Mining Co. v. Mager, 255 U. S. 522; Goodrich v. Edwards, 255 U. S. 527; and Walsh v. Brewster 255 U. S. 536. Mr. Herbert Pope, with whom Mr. RusnC. Butler, Mr. James J. For stall and Mr. E. B. Prettyman were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. The Solicitor General for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darlington v. Mager, 256 U.S. 682, 41 S. Ct. 533, 65 L. Ed. 1169, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1299, 4 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 4745 (1921).

256 U.S. 682 (Darlington v. Mager) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. Smietanka
255 U.S. 509 (Supreme Court, 1921)
Eldorado Coal & Mining Co. v. Mager
255 U.S. 522 (Supreme Court, 1921)
Goodrich v. Edwards
255 U.S. 527 (Supreme Court, 1921)
Walsh v. Brewster
255 U.S. 536 (Supreme Court, 1921)