Darling v. Village of Herkimer

152 N.E.2d 535, 4 N.Y.2d 1000
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 25, 1958
StatusPublished

This text of 152 N.E.2d 535 (Darling v. Village of Herkimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darling v. Village of Herkimer, 152 N.E.2d 535, 4 N.Y.2d 1000 (N.Y. 1958).

Opinion

Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that there is no proof that the village was guilty of negligence in maintaining this pole in the particular place and manner. No opinion.

■ Concur: Judges Desmond, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Voorhis and Burke. Chief Judge Conway and Judge Dye dissent and vote to affirm upon the ground that the evidence was sufficient to present a question of fact from which a jury could reasonably conclude that the Village of Herkimer was negligent in maintaining* the utility pole in the manner it did and that the location of the pole was a proximate cause contributing to the injuries of plaintiff Lauanna Darling.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 N.E.2d 535, 4 N.Y.2d 1000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darling-v-village-of-herkimer-ny-1958.