Darling v. State

799 So. 2d 346, 2001 WL 1327148
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 2001·No. 1D01-1376·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

799 So.2d 346 (2001)

Evans DARLING, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D01-1376.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 30, 2001.

Appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Karen Holland, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied as successive the appellant's Rule 3.800(a) motion, filed while an appeal of the appellant's previous Rule 3.800(a) motion was pending in this Court. The trial court should have dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction. See Williams v. State, 795 So.2d 975 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Accordingly, we vacate the order denying the motion and remand for the trial court to dismiss the motion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darling v. State, 799 So. 2d 346, 2001 WL 1327148 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

799 So. 2d 346 (Darling v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Betts v. State
829 So. 2d 977 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
McClintock v. State
817 So. 2d 1082 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)