Darling v. Bennet

8 Mass. 129
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1811
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 8 Mass. 129 (Darling v. Bennet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darling v. Bennet, 8 Mass. 129 (Mass. 1811).

Opinion

By the Court.

The judge of probate was sufficiently authorized, by the inquisition of the selectmen, to make the decree which he did. But upon the facts now before us there is certainly no sufficient foundation to place the appellant under guardianship as a person non compos mentis. Perhaps it would be proper to place guardians over the children, who are causing their father to waste his estate in gratifying their vicious propensities. Further, if the appellant cannot be otherwise protected from the undue practices and impositions of his children upon him, it may yet be discreet and proper for the judge of probate, upon due representation from the selectmen, to place him under guardianship as a spendthrift, that the family may be preserved from want, and the town saved from the expense of their support.*

Decree reversed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Guardian for Shelleig
8 Ohio N.P. 399 (Scioto County Probate Court, 1901)
In re the Appointment of a Guardian for Tempest
1 Goebel 200 (Hamilton County Probate Court, 1889)
Becton v. Selleck
48 Ala. 226 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1872)
Overseers of the Poor v. Gullifer
49 Me. 360 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1860)
H v. S
4 N.H. 60 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1827)
Jones v. Moore
5 Binn. 573 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1813)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Mass. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darling-v-bennet-mass-1811.