Darley v. Mallary Bros. Machinery Co.
71 S.E. 471, 136 Ga. 345, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 534
Opinion
This ease is controlled by the ruling in White & Corbitt v. Stewart & Co., 131 Ga. 460 (62 S. E. 590), and Joyner v. Smith, 132 Ga. 779 (65 S. E. 68). The petition in a suit for a breach of general warranty of title to land.having failed to allege any eviction or equivalent disturbance by an outstanding paramount title, it was properly dismissed' on demurrer. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Darley v. Mallary Bros. Machinery Co., 71 S.E. 471, 136 Ga. 345, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 534 (Ga. 1911).
71 S.E. 471 (Darley v. Mallary Bros. Machinery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abernathy v. Rylee
72 S.E.2d 300 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
State Mutual Insurance v. McJenkin Insurance & Realty Co.
71 S.E.2d 670 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Brooks v. Winkles
78 S.E. 129 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)