Darlene Smith v. Hertz Schram Pc
This text of Darlene Smith v. Hertz Schram Pc (Darlene Smith v. Hertz Schram Pc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 29, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
158583 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra DARLENE SMITH, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 158583 COA: 337826 Oakland CC: 2016-152060-NM HERTZ SCHRAM, PC and LISA STERN, Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 29, 2020 t0420 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Darlene Smith v. Hertz Schram Pc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darlene-smith-v-hertz-schram-pc-mich-2020.