Home/Ninth Circuit/Darlene Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Company, Inc.

Darlene Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Company, Inc.

409 F.3d 1061, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 8472, 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,935, 2005 WL 1189658
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Darlene Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Company, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 392 F.3d 1076 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 13, 2005·No. 03-15045·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darlene Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Company, Inc., 409 F.3d 1061, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 8472, 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,935, 2005 WL 1189658 (9th Cir. 2005).

409 F.3d 1061 (Darlene Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.