Darlene Jarrett v. Angel Baby Inc.
Opinion
Opinion issued September 23, 2021
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00043-CV ——————————— DARLENE JARRETT, Appellant V. ANGEL BABY INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 20-CCV-068105
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Darlene Jarrett, has failed to timely file a brief. Appellant’s brief
was due August 2, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file
appellant’s brief). On August 11, 2021, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant
that her brief was past due and that her appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless she filed a brief or a motion for an extension of time to file a
brief by August 23, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing failure of
appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case); see also
TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a). Appellant did not respond to the notice and has not filed a
brief or a motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Based on appellant’s
failure to file a brief, appellee, Angel Baby Inc., has filed a motion to dismiss the
appeal for want of prosecution.1 More than ten days have passed, and appellant
has not responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).
Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),
43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Countiss.
1 In its motion, appellee also requested that we “affirm the award of $5,000 in attorney’s fees to [a]ppellee.” We deny that request.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Darlene Jarrett v. Angel Baby Inc. (Darlene Jarrett v. Angel Baby Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.