Darlene Hadley v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission and Naples Community Hospital, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 10, 2020
Docket19-2181
StatusPublished

This text of Darlene Hadley v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission and Naples Community Hospital, Inc. (Darlene Hadley v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission and Naples Community Hospital, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darlene Hadley v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission and Naples Community Hospital, Inc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D19-2181 _____________________________

DARLENE HADLEY,

Appellant,

v.

REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC.,

Appellees. _____________________________

On appeal from the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission. Frank E. Brown, Chairman.

September 10, 2020

PER CURIAM.

Darlene Hadley appeals an order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission affirming the denial of reemployment assistance benefits on the ground that Hadley was discharged for misconduct connected with her work. There is no dispute that Hadley was discharged after she admitted accessing a patient’s medical records without authorization in violation of the employer’s confidentiality policy, which was promulgated to comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Hadley conceded that she knew about the policy’s requirements and that she had to complete annual training regarding HIPAA compliance. Although there is no Florida case law directly addressing this issue, courts of other jurisdictions have held that unemployment benefits are properly denied based upon work-related misconduct where an employee knowingly accesses a patient’s records—without the patient’s authorization— in violation of the employer’s rules regarding HIPAA compliance. See, e.g., Pesoli v. Dep’t of Emp’t Sec., 983 N.E.2d 1, 6-8 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012) (affirming the denial of unemployment insurance benefits based upon work-related misconduct where a hospital secretary accessed a patient’s confidential medical records for a non-work related reason knowing that it violated the hospital’s confidentiality policy concerning HIPAA). Because Hadley has failed to show reversible error, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Darlene Hadley, pro se, Appellant.

Amanda L. Neff of Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pesoli v. Department of Employment Security
2012 IL App (1st) 111835 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Darlene Hadley v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission and Naples Community Hospital, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darlene-hadley-v-reemployment-assistance-appeals-commission-and-naples-fladistctapp-2020.