Dark v. Grant Produce Company

Indiana Court of Appeals

Dark v. Grant Produce Company

161 N.E. 927, 87 Ind. App. 695, 1928 Ind. App. LEXIS 98

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided May 18, 1928·No. No. 13,258.·Published

Opinion

McMahan, J.

Appellant filed an application for compensation on account of an injury alleged to have been received by her in August, 1927, and while in the course of her employment by appellee. The Industrial Board found that the alleged injury was not received by her at the time alleged, or at any other time within the statutory period of two years, and denied compensation.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain a finding that appellant was suffering from an inguinal hernia, which did not arise out of or in the course of her employment by appellee.

Award affirmed.

Dausman, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMahan, J.

Appellant filed an application for compensation on account of an injury alleged to have been received by her in August, 1927, and while in the course of her employment by appellee. The Industrial Board found that the alleged injury was not received by her at the time alleged, or at any other time within the statutory period of two years, and denied compensation.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain a finding that appellant was suffering from an inguinal hernia, which did not arise out of or in the course of her employment by appellee.

Award affirmed.

Dausman, J., absent.

Dark v. Grant Produce Company, 161 N.E. 927, 87 Ind. App. 695, 1928 Ind. App. LEXIS 98 (Ind. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

161 N.E. 927 (Dark v. Grant Produce Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.