DARIUS VASHON STILL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of DARIUS VASHON STILL v. STATE OF FLORIDA (DARIUS VASHON STILL v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DARIUS VASHON STILL, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D16-940
[March 1, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432011000722CFAXMX.
Darius Vashon Still, Okeechobee, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
TAYLOR, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DARIUS VASHON STILL v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darius-vashon-still-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.