Darius Tyshawn Otey v. State of Arkansas

2024 Ark. App. 511
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 23, 2024
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2024 Ark. App. 511 (Darius Tyshawn Otey v. State of Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darius Tyshawn Otey v. State of Arkansas, 2024 Ark. App. 511 (Ark. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 511 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CR-23-815

Opinion Delivered October 23, 2024 DARIUS TYSHAWN OTEY APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SEVENTH DIVISION V. [NO. 60CR-22-2207]

STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE KAREN D. WHATLEY, APPELLEE JUDGE REMANDED TO SETTLE AND SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

WENDY SCHOLTENS WOOD, Judge

Darius Otey appeals the sentencing order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court

convicting him of first-degree battery and sentencing him to ten years’ imprisonment. On

appeal, Otey argues that the circuit court erred in failing to grant a directed verdict on the

basis of the State’s failure to negate his justification defense. We remand to settle and

supplement the record.

At the conclusion of Otey’s trial, the court read from the verdict forms handed by the

jury foreperson to the bailiff during both the guilt and sentencing phases. Arkansas Supreme

Court Rule 3-4(c)(2) states that when there is a jury trial, the verdict forms shall be inserted

into the record. See also Ross v. State, 2024 Ark. 70, at 1. Those forms, however, are not

included in the record of the proceedings. In addition, the written jury instructions are also

not included in the record. Therefore, we remand to settle and supplement the record with the jury-verdict forms as well as the written jury instructions in accordance with Arkansas

Rule of Appellate Procedure–Civil 6(a), made applicable through Arkansas Rule of Appellate

Procedure–Criminal 4(a). Otey has thirty days from the date of this opinion to file a

supplemental record with this court.

Remanded to settle and supplement the record.

KLAPPENBACH and THYER, JJ., agree.

Jimmy C. Morris Jr., for appellant.

Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: A. Evangeline Bacon, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Darius Tyshawn Otey v. State of Arkansas
2025 Ark. App. 64 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 Ark. App. 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darius-tyshawn-otey-v-state-of-arkansas-arkctapp-2024.