Darius T. Chaney v. State of Florida
This text of Darius T. Chaney v. State of Florida (Darius T. Chaney v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 8, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D26-0057 Lower Tribunal No. F16-25255 ________________
Darius T. Chaney, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141 (b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge.
Darius T. Chaney, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Senior Assistant Attorney General for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See George v. State, 213 So. 3d 966, 967 (Fla. 1st DCA
2015) (“Double jeopardy challenges to a defendant’s convictions are not
cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion.”); Salazar v. State, 675 So. 2d 654, 654
(Fla. 3d DCA 1996) ("The double jeopardy argument Salazar advances in
this case is a challenge to his convictions, not sentences, and thus is not
cognizable under the rule regarding motions to correct illegal sentences.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Darius T. Chaney v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darius-t-chaney-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.