Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/Darius Shundale Dohnalik v. State

Darius Shundale Dohnalik v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 30, 2013·No. 03-12-00491-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 30, 2013

NO. 03-12-00491-CR

Darius Shundale Dohnalik, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND ROSE AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment of conviction.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is in all things affirmed; and

it appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs

is made; and that this decision be certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darius Shundale Dohnalik v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Darius Shundale Dohnalik v. State (Darius Shundale Dohnalik v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.