Darius Sauls v. the State of Texas
This text of Darius Sauls v. the State of Texas (Darius Sauls v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion Filed June 9, 2023
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00501-CR No. 05-23-00502-CR No. 05-23-00503-CR
DARIUS SAULS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F22-00668-M, F21-31855-M, F22-31450-M
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Kennedy, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III Appellant appeals the trial court’s failure to lower appellant’s bond pending
trial. Appellant states in his combined notice of appeal for these cases,
“Defendant . . . files this appeal of excessive bail. Bail is excessive set at $100,000
each solely to keep accuse[d] incarcerated until trial.” The Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals has held, “There is no constitutional or statutory authority granting the
courts of appeals jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals regarding excessive bail
or the denial of bail.” Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). The trial court’s online docket sheets for these cases show no appealable
orders have been entered. See In re Johnson, 599 S.W.3d 311, 311 (Tex. App.—
Dallas 2020, no pet.) (taking judicial notice of trial court’s online docket sheet).
Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over these appeals.
We dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction.
230501f.u05 230502f.u05 /Bill Pedersen, III// 230503f.u05 BILL PEDERSEN, III Do Not Publish JUSTICE TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
DARIUS SAULS, Appellant On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-23-00501-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F22-00668-M. Opinion delivered by Justice THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Pedersen, III. Justices Kennedy and Garcia participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered this 9th day of June, 2023.
–3– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
DARIUS SAULS, Appellant On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-23-00502-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F21-31855-M. Opinion delivered by Justice THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Pedersen, III. Justices Kennedy and Garcia participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.
–4– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
DARIUS SAULS, Appellant On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-23-00503-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F22-31450-M. Opinion delivered by Justice THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Pedersen, III. Justices Garcia and Kennedy participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.
–5–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Darius Sauls v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darius-sauls-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.