Darios Tramain Crayton-Scott v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 21, 2018·No. 14-18-00197-CR·Published

Opinion

Motion Granted and Order filed June 21, 2018

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-18-00194-CR NO. 14-18-00195-CR NO. 14-18-00196-CR NO. 14-18-00197-CR ____________

DARIOS TRAMAIN CRAYTON-SCOTT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1484225, 1511723, 1511724, and 1511725

ORDER Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Counsel filed a motion for appellant to review the records so he may file a pro se brief if he chooses. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 228th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial records in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the records to appellant on or before July 6, 2018; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the records to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within 30 days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darios Tramain Crayton-Scott v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Darios Tramain Crayton-Scott v. State (Darios Tramain Crayton-Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)