Darios Tramain Crayton-Scott v. State
This text of Darios Tramain Crayton-Scott v. State (Darios Tramain Crayton-Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion Granted and Order filed June 21, 2018
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-18-00194-CR NO. 14-18-00195-CR NO. 14-18-00196-CR NO. 14-18-00197-CR ____________
DARIOS TRAMAIN CRAYTON-SCOTT, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 228th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1484225, 1511723, 1511724, and 1511725
ORDER Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Counsel filed a motion for appellant to review the records so he may file a pro se brief if he chooses. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 228th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial records in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the records to appellant on or before July 6, 2018; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the records to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within 30 days of that date.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Darios Tramain Crayton-Scott v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darios-tramain-crayton-scott-v-state-texapp-2018.