Dario Polo-Mexicano v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-22-00369-CR __________________
DARIO POLO-MEXICANO, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 21-359332 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 15, 2022, we notified the parties that the appeal would be
dismissed for want of prosecution unless the appellant arranged to file the record or
explained why she needed additional time to do so. The Court, however, received
no response to its request.
There is also nothing in the record that shows the appellant is entitled to
proceed without paying costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. Because the appellant has
1 not explained why she failed to file the record in her appeal, we dismiss the appeal
for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on January 31, 2023 Opinion Delivered February 1, 2023 Do Not Publish
Before Horton, Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dario Polo-Mexicano v. the State of Texas (Dario Polo-Mexicano v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.