Dario Polo-Mexicano v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 1, 2023·No. 09-22-00369-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00369-CR __________________

DARIO POLO-MEXICANO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 21-359332 __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 15, 2022, we notified the parties that the appeal would be

dismissed for want of prosecution unless the appellant arranged to file the record or

explained why she needed additional time to do so. The Court, however, received

no response to its request.

There is also nothing in the record that shows the appellant is entitled to

proceed without paying costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. Because the appellant has

1 not explained why she failed to file the record in her appeal, we dismiss the appeal

for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on January 31, 2023 Opinion Delivered February 1, 2023 Do Not Publish

Before Horton, Johnson and Wright, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dario Polo-Mexicano v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Dario Polo-Mexicano v. the State of Texas (Dario Polo-Mexicano v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.