Dario Marchione General Contractor, Inc. v. David R. Cassara-Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dario Marchione General Contractor, Inc. v. David R. Cassara-Associates

129 A.D.2d 973, 514 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45630

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 3, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from Special Term’s order which denied its motion to dismiss based on documentary evidence and payment. On appeal defendant asserts that dismissal should be granted because there has been an accord and satisfaction. We [974] disagree. Inasmuch as this ground for dismissal was not raised at Special Term, it will not be considered on appeal (see, Pietropaoli Trucking v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 100 AD2d 680). Moreover, the restrictive language on the face of the check created an issue of fact whether plaintiff was clearly informed that its acceptance discharged all claims (see, Conboy, McKay, Bachman & Kendall v Armstrong, 110 AD2d 1042, 1043). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J.—dismiss complaint.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from Special Term’s order which denied its motion to dismiss based on documentary evidence and payment. On appeal defendant asserts that dismissal should be granted because there has been an accord and satisfaction. We [974] disagree. Inasmuch as this ground for dismissal was not raised at Special Term, it will not be considered on appeal (see, Pietropaoli Trucking v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 100 AD2d 680). Moreover, the restrictive language on the face of the check created an issue of fact whether plaintiff was clearly informed that its acceptance discharged all claims (see, Conboy, McKay, Bachman & Kendall v Armstrong, 110 AD2d 1042, 1043). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J.—dismiss complaint.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Dario Marchione General Contractor, Inc. v. David R. Cassara-Associates, 129 A.D.2d 973, 514 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

129 A.D.2d 973 (Dario Marchione General Contractor, Inc. v. David R. Cassara-Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related