Dario Arias v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 24, 2010
Docket04-10-00026-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Dario Arias v. State (Dario Arias v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dario Arias v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00026-CR

Dario ARIAS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008-CR-0652 Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 24, 2010

DISMISSED

Appellant Dario Arias pleaded nolo contendere to the offense of indecency with a child by

contact pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. As part of his plea-bargain, appellant signed a separate

“Waiver of Appeal.” The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is

a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and “the defendant has waived the

1 … The Honorable Pat Priest, sitting by assignment. 04-10-00026-CR

right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal. The

clerk’s record, which includes the plea bargain agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2)

certification, has been filed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.”

Id.

The court gave appellant notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial

court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within

thirty days. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.–San

Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet.

ref’d) (not designated for publication). Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written

response, stating she has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After reviewing the

record and counsel’s notice, we agree appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State,

154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record

to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal. TEX .

R. APP . P. 25.2(d).

Do Not Publish

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dario Arias v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dario-arias-v-state-texapp-2010.