Darik Alexander v. Capital One, N.A.
This text of Darik Alexander v. Capital One, N.A. (Darik Alexander v. Capital One, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2025-1129 Lower Tribunal No. 2023-CA-014550 _____________________________
DARIK ALEXANDER,
Appellant, v.
CAPITAL ONE, N.A.,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County. Heather Pinder Rodriguez, Judge.
May 29, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Winter Park Hosp., LLC v. On Target Staffing, LLC, 419
So. 3d 306, 311 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025) (“To have the trial court set aside the default
final judgment, WPH had to prove by sworn evidence that (1) its failure to retain
new counsel as ordered by the trial court was the result of excusable neglect, (2) its
affirmative defenses and counterclaim established that it had meritorious defenses
and claims warranting a trial on the merits, and (3) it acted with due diligence from
the time when it learned of the default to the filing for relief.” (emphasis added)). TRAVER, C.J., and SMITH and MIZE, JJ., concur.
Darik Alexander, Windermere, pro se.
Michael Thiel Debski, of Debski & Associates, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Darik Alexander v. Capital One, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darik-alexander-v-capital-one-na-fladistctapp-2026.