D'Ariano v. Meldish

68 A.D.3d 640, 890 N.Y.2d 324
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2009·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Defendants carried their prima facie burden by showing that the injured plaintiffs disc condition was degenerative and not caused by the trauma of the accident. Plaintiffs failed to adequately address such showing (see DeJesus v Paulino, 61 AD3d 605, 607-608 [2009]); speculation by plaintiffs family physician, that a radiologist who conducted an MRI of plaintiffs lumbar spine would have noted the existence of degenerative disc disease in his report had he seen any, was properly rejected by the motion court. In view of the foregoing, it is unnecessary to address the parties’ other contentions. Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'Ariano v. Meldish, 68 A.D.3d 640, 890 N.Y.2d 324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

68 A.D.3d 640 (D'Ariano v. Meldish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vaughan v. Leon
94 A.D.3d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Kerr v. Klinger
71 A.D.3d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)