Daria v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Daria v. State

92 So. 3d 875, 2012 WL 2549849, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10688

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 3, 2012

DocketNo. 1D12-1142

StatusPublished

This text of 92 So. 3d 875 (Daria v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daria v. State, 92 So. 3d 875, 2012 WL 2549849, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10688 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively to defendants whose convictions were already final when that case was decided), rev. granted, 81 So.3d 414 (Fla.2012); Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); State v. Shaikh, 65 So.3d 539 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (same).

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively to defendants whose convictions were already final when that case was decided), rev. granted, 81 So.3d 414 (Fla.2012); Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); State v. Shaikh, 65 So.3d 539 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (same).

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 So. 3d 875, 2012 WL 2549849, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daria-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack