Daria v. State

92 So. 3d 875, 2012 WL 2549849, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10688
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 3, 2012·No. No. 1D12-1142·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively to defendants whose convictions were already final when that case was decided), rev. granted, 81 So.3d 414 (Fla.2012); Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (same); State v. Shaikh, 65 So.3d 539 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (same).

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daria v. State, 92 So. 3d 875, 2012 WL 2549849, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10688 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

92 So. 3d 875 (Daria v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
State v. Shaikh
65 So. 3d 539 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Barrios-Cruz v. State
63 So. 3d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Hernandez v. State
61 So. 3d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)