Dargan Suther v. City of Midfield, Inc.

Fifth Circuit

Dargan Suther v. City of Midfield, Inc.

389 F.2d 1002

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 26, 1968

Docket24958

StatusPublished

This text of 389 F.2d 1002 (Dargan Suther v. City of Midfield, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dargan Suther v. City of Midfield, Inc., 389 F.2d 1002 (5th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is the second appeal in this case. 1 This Court, in affirming the dismissal of the complaint in the first appeal, held that Appellant had not adequately alleged a jurisdictional amount. Assuming that the jurisdictional prerequisites have now been met, we find that Appellant’s contentions are without merit and the granting of Appellee’s motion for summary judgment was correct.

Affirmed.

1

. See Suther v. City of Midfield, 5 Cir., 1966, 358 F.2d 740.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is the second appeal in this case. 1 This Court, in affirming the dismissal of the complaint in the first appeal, held that Appellant had not adequately alleged a jurisdictional amount. Assuming that the jurisdictional prerequisites have now been met, we find that Appellant’s contentions are without merit and the granting of Appellee’s motion for summary judgment was correct.

Affirmed.

1

. See Suther v. City of Midfield, 5 Cir., 1966, 358 F.2d 740.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

389 F.2d 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dargan-suther-v-city-of-midfield-inc-ca5-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack