Darensbourg v. Cassano

8 La. App. 479, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 147
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 11, 1928
StatusPublished

This text of 8 La. App. 479 (Darensbourg v. Cassano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darensbourg v. Cassano, 8 La. App. 479, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 147 (La. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

ELLIOTT, J.

The petition, exceptions and judgment in this case, are, in all respects like that in the case of Joseph A. Patin vs. the same defendants, except that this suit was brought by H. H. Darensbourg.

For the reasons given by this Court in the suit of Joseph Patin vs. Henry Cassano, et als., this day decided, the judgment appealed from herein is annulled, avoided and set aside.

The exception of misjoinder filed by Henry Cassano and that by J. L. Jeffries are overruled, and the case is remanded to the lower court to be proceeded with in the manner and form prescribed by law.

Defendants to pay the cost of the exception and the cost of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 La. App. 479, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darensbourg-v-cassano-lactapp-1928.