Daren Danzy v. Russell Sheppard
This text of Daren Danzy v. Russell Sheppard (Daren Danzy v. Russell Sheppard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ December 05, 2024
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A25E0046. DANZY v. SHEPPARD et al.
Appellant Daren Danzy’s emergency motion seeking relief pursuant to Rule 40 (b) is hereby DENIED. See generally Florez v. State, 311 Ga. App. 378, 383 (2) (715 SE2d 782) (2011) (holding that the trial court is authorized to enter an order requiring a supersedeas bond after the filing of a notice of appeal but enforcement of the bond order is limited to removal of supersedeas).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 12/05/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daren Danzy v. Russell Sheppard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daren-danzy-v-russell-sheppard-gactapp-2024.