Dare v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dare v. State

458 S.W.3d 462, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 290, 2015 WL 1246265

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 17, 2015·No. No. ED 101061·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Dare appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Dare appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Dare v. State, 458 S.W.3d 462, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 290, 2015 WL 1246265 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

458 S.W.3d 462 (Dare v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.