Dare v. Chicago Horseman Newspaper Co.

159 Ill. App. 546, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 1017
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedFebruary 3, 1911
DocketGen. No. 15,191
StatusPublished

This text of 159 Ill. App. 546 (Dare v. Chicago Horseman Newspaper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dare v. Chicago Horseman Newspaper Co., 159 Ill. App. 546, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 1017 (Ill. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Baldwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendant in error recovered a judgment for $679.13 in the Municipal Court for damages for breach of contract of employment for six months at $125 per month. The employment of the plaintiff was conceded, but it was contended that he fraudulently misrepresented his qualifications for the position, and that his discharge for incompetency was lawful.

Plaintiff in error was publishing a newspaper, and advertised to procure a competent editorial writer for that kind of work. As evidence of his qualifications for the position, defendant in error submitted, in his own handwriting, two- articles, which were of such merit as to be largely influential in securing his employment. After two weeks of service he was .discharged for alleged incompetency, and paid $42.44 for the time he had been employed.

After the verdict, plaintiff in error endeavored to secure a new trial, based upon affidavits strongly tending to show that the two articles submitted in the handwriting of the defendant in error as his own, and which were largely influential in securing his employment, were not, in fact, the product of his own brain, but were copied very largely from The New York Herald.

Since the matter referred to in the affidavits would, if proven, have a strong tendency to affect the result of the suit, we think the court below should have granted a new trial upon the showing made, and the judgment is, therefore, reversed, and the cause remanded for another trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 Ill. App. 546, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 1017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dare-v-chicago-horseman-newspaper-co-illappct-1911.