Darden v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2007·No. 07-1867·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1867

FREDERICK DARDEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00428-REP)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 18, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Darden, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Frederick Darden appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Darden v. United

States, No. 3:07-cv-00428-REP (E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darden v. United States, (4th Cir. 2007).

Darden v. United States (Darden v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.