Darden v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Darden v. State

75 S.W.2d 680

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 31, 1934

DocketNo. 16993

StatusPublished

This text of 75 S.W.2d 680 (Darden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Darden v. State, 75 S.W.2d 680 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary.

The evidence heard before the trial court is not brought up for review. The indictment seems regular and regularly presented.

It appears that the sentence orders the confinement of the appellant in the penitentiary for a term of not less than two nor more than three years. To accord with the verdict it must condemn the appellant to confinement in the penitentiary for a period of not less than two nor more than two years (Pen. Code 1925, art. 1397).

As so reformed, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary.

The evidence heard before the trial court is not brought up for review. The indictment seems regular and regularly presented.

It appears that the sentence orders the confinement of the appellant in the penitentiary for a term of not less than two nor more than three years. To accord with the verdict it must condemn the appellant to confinement in the penitentiary for a period of not less than two nor more than two years (Pen. Code 1925, art. 1397).

As so reformed, the judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 S.W.2d 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darden-v-state-texcrimapp-1934.